Rating tables - the good, the bad and the ugly

Rating tables - the good, the bad and the ugly

Classification tables are some of the most important parts of the web site. Through a web site, I mean everything to do with ratings and ratings. In most cases, product or services are being analyzed, the written form needs a detailed explanation, but some can handle a small bit of icons and text in front of them.

However, there are usually issues about class rated tables, especially when they design them. There are several questions to answer designers. Do they want these designs to live on a straight point or want them to navigate through the article? In most cases, the best of the web site is, if the viewer remains as far as possible as possible, so the most common classification tables are basically virtual, where You need to click your way through the information. But there are some exceptions.

Now we get a service that is very difficult to review with just icons and a little text. How will the UI / UX designer handle this fact? Do they click on their way through the reader information, or do they make it instantly accessible?

The UX word itself should explain the answer itself. User experience needs to be extra. Once a viewer uses a website, he should not be afraid to return to it. Today we are care services, financial service providers, or forex brokers, if so, you want to call them.

That's why they are such a good example that it is impossible for some small icons and text-based ratings and modify them. They require mass articles that are dedicated to discussing all aspects of their technical aspects, legal aspects, and focus on human resources and details. Most websites that host hosting tables on their platforms of these companies need to easily find the company to help the audience. But let's see some examples so that the design is done well.

The good

As already mentioned, a good rating table needs to be done 2 things. It needs to provide audiences information, to make additional steps (viewers can only find relevant information by looking at the table) and they need to keep the Prime Minister busy, meaning that they press "Press" Instead of being forced to go out of the geography.

We can look at the Forex Newsstand table when we see the table. Companies are shown with their names and signs that are just a standard. However, they are also with icons and related information. It is difficult to know what this information is, but a person interested in a Forex broker is most relevant to it. What is the cost of the service, how long it is, bonuses and what kind of scope they follow.

After showing the most important information, the audience offers an audience to continue reading the review. At this time the user can not force it to read, they have already acquired the most important information and can just leave. It's UX, meaning that even if the viewer does not have a long stay on the website, they will return at least in the future.

The ugly

It can be surprisingly, but some of the most popular websites that feature reviews are the highest rated tables. Unfortunately, I can find out the old models of Investing.com, where they show at least the information on the table.

Symptoms for the company on the classification table, their very brief details and only 3 sections of the key features only. It is also frustrating to see that there is no rating system too.

So the user really needs to access the article by clicking on the table and find more through it. This is not the best way to handle the UX because it does not cause additional trouble for the user when it should not be.

The Bad

Another popular website for these types of classification tables is Antopodia, where people can find many leaders when starting a financial campaign. Ranked tables on this website are relatively better than they are because their original rating is attached. However, here we also find a lack of information from the site's part.

The table contains only service ratings and a small description. Here, in order to compel the audience, the entire article is forced to get the full value to click and review. Although it is not better than any information, it still lacks good UI / UX designs and includes additional steps for website visitors.

The bottom line

So what is the bottom line for class rated tables? Basically, all these UI / UXs and the way you design your website pages come down.

There are two ways to do this. Do so that the visitor will continue to stay on your site for a long time, but it is unlikely to return, or just stay on the web for less time, but become a constant prime minister in the future. Both slices of this cake are very difficult for this website. But to separate it from there

Post a Comment